Net resales
Automated performance
variance monitoring
Mage compares product and healthcare account results on a consistent basis, applies your thresholds, and prepares the changes your commercial team needs to investigate.
Prior periods
Review limits
Match periods
Compare vials
Flag changes
Prepare review
Retain basis
Performance variance review
Weekly reporting
Net-vial change
+150
Review flags
1 of 2
| Account group | Δ vials | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital accounts | +70 | Below limit |
| Community practices | +80 | Flagged |
A + B in both periods · C excluded
ReviewContributionsComparison basis
From comparable net sales to a focused variance review
Compare the same package units, account groups and included feeds before flagging changes against your approved review limits.
Net vials · feeds A + B
1,800 → 1,950
Hospital accounts
+70
1,100 → 1,170
Community practices
+80
700 → 780
Total movement
+150 vials
+8.3%
See what contributed to the change
Break the net-vial movement into hospital and community account contributions without treating channel sales as patient demand.
Absolute change
≥50 vials
Relative change
≥10%
Hospital accounts
+70 · +6.4%Below limitCommunity practices
+80 · +11.4%Review flagLimits v03 · review prepared
Flag changes that meet both limits
Apply absolute-unit and percentage thresholds together, keeping a large unit change distinct from a meaningful relative movement.
Comparison basis
Metrics v04
ARevision 03Included
BRevision 02Included
CLate arrivalExcluded
NDC-01 · vials · same feeds
Comparable scope
Keep comparisons on the same basis
Retain product, package, period and source coverage checks so missing feeds and definition changes do not become performance signals.
Measure how your team gets from change to review
Less recurring
comparison work
Measure the effort to align periods, calculate changes and assemble product and account review packs.
Changes prepared
for investigation
Track time from accepted results to a variance review delivered with its account contributions.
Review limits
applied consistently
Track threshold versions, held comparisons and source coverage before commercial owners interpret changes.
How Mage fits
Connect accepted results to your commercial review
Compare reconciled sales measures with retained baselines and approved limits, then deliver review workbooks and supporting breakdowns.
Your systems
Accepted sales measures
Net vials by product and account
Comparable baselines
Prior periods and included feeds
Approved review limits
Unit and percentage thresholds
The workflow between your tools
- 1Check comparable scope
- 2Calculate and flag changes
- 3Prepare the review
Your teams & tools
Variance review
Changes meeting approved limits
Account contributions
Signed product and channel movements
Comparison basis
Periods, feeds and rule revisions
Your commercial team interprets changes and decides follow-up.
Your performance changes, prepared for review
A variance workbook with flagged comparisons, account contributions and the source basis behind each review.
Explore industry solutionsNet resales
Prior results
Review limits
Account scope
Metric rules
Performance variance review
Single NDC · Weekly reporting
Net-vial change
+150
Review flags
1 of 2
| Account group | Δ vials | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital accounts | +70 | Below limit |
| Community practices | +80 | Flagged |
A + B in both periods · C excludedPrior 1,800 → current 1,950 vials · limits v03
ReviewContributionsComparison basis
Learn
Define comparable results
Agree products, account groups and periods your team will compare.
Design
Set the review limits
Define unit thresholds, percentage limits and coverage exclusions.
Automate
Launch recurring reviews
Validate one comparison, then deliver changes with their source basis.
Automate your commercial variance monitoring
Tell us which product or account changes you review, which periods you compare and which thresholds should trigger investigation.